新东方网>留学>GRE首页>GRE辅导>GRE写作>正文

2018年GRE作文范文:审查的公正性

2018-03-30 16:47

来源:新东方网

作者:

2018年留学备考规划>>点击查看
托福 雅思 GRE GMAT SAT

  为了帮助更多的考生分析GRE作文范文的写作思路,分享GRE写作的方法和指导,新东方网为大家带来2018年GRE作文范文:审查的公正性,希望能够大家提高的GRE写作。

  Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.

  2018年GRE作文范文参考:

  “Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.

  Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.

  The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put 最新娱乐平台送体验金 or less a negative effect on their development.

  Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a 最新娱乐平台送体验金 ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a 最新娱乐平台送体验金 ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.

  以上就是新东方网为你带来的2018年GRE作文范文:审查的公正性,希望能够对大家有所帮助。

  最新热文推荐:

  GRE佛脚词最新下载

  GRE 330分备考秘籍

  GRE考试查分完全手册

  2017-2018世界大学排名汇总

  ETS官方正式发布GRE考试的GPO

(兼职编辑:lihaiyan)

新东方GRE二维码

新东方网GRE官方微信:GRE(微信号:GRE-XDF

这里有最新GRE考试资讯、GRE真题解析,GRE资料下载,扫一扫二维码关注我们的官方微信! 

新东方GRE辅导专区

班级名称 上课地点 上课时间 费用 详细

焦点推荐

精品直播

版权及免责声明

凡本网注明"稿件来源:新东方"的所有文字、图片和音视频稿件,版权均属新东方教育科技集团(含本网和新东方网) 所有,任何媒体、网站或个人未经本网协议授权不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他任何方式复制、发表。已经本网协议授权的媒体、网站,在下载使用时必须注明"稿件来源:新东方",违者本网将依法追究法律责任。

本网未注明"稿件来源:新东方"的文/图等稿件均为转载稿,本网转载仅基于传递更多信息之目的,并不意味着赞同转载稿的观点或证实其内容的真实性。如其他媒体、网站或个人从本网下载使用,必须保留本网注明的"稿件来源",并自负版权等法律责任。如擅自篡改为"稿件来源:新东方",本网将依法追究法律责任。

如本网转载稿涉及版权等问题,请作者见稿后在两周内速来电与新东方网联系,电话:010-60908555。

博聚网